I didnt claim it was conclusive, I dont think in realistic terms anything can really be conclusive. In the same respect that if it an equal amount of evidence claimed a bridge to have structural integrity issues, I'd accept that and wouldn't risk crossing the bridge.
There's plenty of data points, independent of each other, independent sciences, and they corroborate with each other.
Hey, if you dont accept it, thats fine. Doesn't bother me. As long as you dont go spread misinformation, especially when off-topic - would you agree with that?
I didnt claim it was conclusive, I dont think in realistic terms...
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 34 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Add WHC (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
$6.99 |
Change
0.250(3.71%) |
Mkt cap ! $5.847B | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| $6.93 | $7.07 | $6.82 | $48.33M | 6.935M |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 5 | 6200 | $6.99 |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| $7.00 | 6264 | 1 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 16.10pm 28/10/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
| WHC (ASX) Chart |