You've literally dont exactly what every other poster here had done - you've asserted the authors are wrong, but you haven't provided any evidence or data to suggest they are wrong.
Did you read the paper? Did you find a flaw with the methodology?
Simply stating ""...is another attempt my the woke brigade to blame fossil fuels for everything." Is ridiculous. You didn't even read the article did you?
"In regards CO2 " naturally occurring " as I suggested , activities that man has no part in the process such as plant decay and volcanic activity is by my understanding going to take place regardless of human activity , but you knew this anyway !"
Yes, and I responded by saying I believe you have confused the role of carbon flux. I even put in a little video to help educate you on the point.
Your errors are erroneous. Carbon flux is in balance without anthropogenic forces. I dont know how you can not understand it. A 3rd graded understands the concept of the following which I will try to explain simply for you;
You have a bath, and the tap turns on, the flow rate is 10L per hour.
The drain in the bath also empties at 10L per hour.
As both are equal, the bathtub doesn't fill up.
Now, lets add in an anthropogenic force of 300ml per minute. (this is out "3%" so widely claimed)
Every minute, 300ml is added, because the drain is still emptying at 10L per minute.
After 24 hours, suddenly the bath has filled by 7.2L.
Can you understand that?
"I suspect you like EV powered by fossil fuels ?"What has this got to do with the science of climate change?
"We can agree to disagree , I am happy to drive my diesel Land Cruiser that will last forever in regards to EV that will dramatically depreciate . Market forces are telling you that EVs are not a smart move going forward "
Okay? Again, what has this got to do with the science of climate change? It doesn't change any of the physics or chemistry.
I dont know that your diesel land cruiser will last for ever, nor do I accept that EV's are not a smart move going forward. EV uptake is huge, and will almost certainly continue.
You're buying VCR players, whilst the rest of the world is going to the cloud. Thats the analogy.
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- Climate Change
WHC
whitehaven coal limited
Add to My Watchlist
2.26%
!
$6.49

You've literally dont exactly what every other poster here had...
Featured News
Add to My Watchlist
What is My Watchlist?
A personalised tool to help users track selected stocks. Delivering real-time notifications on price updates, announcements, and performance stats on each to help make informed investment decisions.
|
|||||
Last
$6.49 |
Change
-0.150(2.26%) |
Mkt cap ! $5.402B |
Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
$6.52 | $6.56 | $6.48 | $3.007M | 461.7K |
Buyers (Bids)
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
22 | 14890 | $6.49 |
Sellers (Offers)
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
$6.50 | 19544 | 18 |
View Market Depth
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
19 | 14313 | 6.490 |
25 | 46628 | 6.480 |
13 | 29858 | 6.470 |
11 | 41880 | 6.460 |
13 | 45741 | 6.450 |
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
6.500 | 19544 | 18 |
6.510 | 17157 | 15 |
6.520 | 13215 | 14 |
6.530 | 38373 | 18 |
6.540 | 41133 | 15 |
Last trade - 10.49am 31/07/2025 (20 minute delay) ? |
Featured News
WHC (ASX) Chart |