Climate Change, page-213

I didn't say they were the same thing did I? More misquoting and misunderstanding. I said for all intents and purposes I'll use them interchangeably. To simplify things in an already complicated subject, I don't see a problem with the terminology.

"And if you need evidence or peer reviews then you might need to reconsider your whole thought process"

Wow, imagine making a claim, then when someone asked for evidence you said "You need evidence??"

If you're going to come here and try and debate, at least understand the rules of engagement. Another nupty making assertions with no evidence.

If the science behind climate change is all wrong and a hoax and a conspiracy, surely you must know of some evidence to show that??
Not once have you, Hagetaka, Zachary1000, etc provided a single source for me to look at. You've all had dozens and dozens of chances.