I know he's stating its statistically significant, but he's claiming its statistically significant from the graph! you cant tell statistical significance from a graph! it its a mathematically formulated number! I am saying that he hasn't proved its a statistically significant difference. If you want to provide the graph he's using, I'll happily look at it.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Statistical_significance
There's a little crash course/refresher for you.
"its obviously, blatantly a huge issue that is not being investigated"
It clearly is being investigated you nupty because the doctors on the panel are aware of it mention that they have given explanations for it earlier that day.
"please don't try and sweep it under the rug , excess deaths is a massive issue"
I didn't try and sweep it under the rug, stop setting up ***'s or claiming I have said something when I didn't. When did I try and sweep it under the rug? Please quote me directly.
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- WHC
- Climate Change
Climate Change, page-379
-
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 699 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add WHC (ASX) to my watchlist
(20min delay)
|
|||||
Last
$7.09 |
Change
0.150(2.16%) |
Mkt cap ! $5.931B |
Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
$7.00 | $7.17 | $6.99 | $56.08M | 7.917M |
Buyers (Bids)
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
6 | 137399 | $7.08 |
Sellers (Offers)
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
$7.10 | 9407 | 2 |
View Market Depth
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
1 | 1000 | 7.080 |
1 | 20000 | 7.060 |
5 | 14298 | 7.050 |
1 | 2000 | 7.040 |
1 | 2150 | 7.020 |
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
7.130 | 3200 | 1 |
7.140 | 10000 | 1 |
7.150 | 7988 | 5 |
7.160 | 1370 | 2 |
7.170 | 24843 | 4 |
Last trade - 16.10pm 27/09/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
Featured News
WHC (ASX) Chart |