It can certainly look statistically significant, but I repeat, you cannot tell statistical significance merely looking at a graph. If you did an undergraduate statistics class (I did two fyi) and said the data was statistically significant because it looked statistically significant on a graph, you'd fail.
I don't know what the reason is. I'm happy to admit I don't know. But I'm not going to jump to any conclusions either. I suggest you conspiracy theorist do the same. Perhaps read the scientific paper that the doctor cited towards the end of that video. I doubt you will, and that's the difference between you and I.
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- Climate Change
It can certainly look statistically significant, but I repeat,...
-
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 697 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add WHC (ASX) to my watchlist
(20min delay)
|
|||||
Last
$8.32 |
Change
-0.110(1.30%) |
Mkt cap ! $6.960B |
Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
$8.40 | $8.57 | $8.21 | $70.24M | 8.520M |
Buyers (Bids)
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
1 | 23024 | $8.32 |
Sellers (Offers)
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
$8.33 | 13633 | 2 |
View Market Depth
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
1 | 459 | 8.300 |
2 | 5603 | 8.290 |
4 | 19133 | 8.280 |
4 | 108742 | 8.270 |
3 | 53144 | 8.260 |
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
8.330 | 380 | 1 |
8.340 | 14659 | 7 |
8.350 | 20715 | 2 |
8.360 | 17034 | 1 |
8.370 | 21534 | 2 |
Last trade - 16.10pm 19/07/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
Featured News
WHC (ASX) Chart |