The two sources that he has posted in the last month are either...

The two sources that he has posted in the last month are either opinion pieces/extremely flawed - that's spreading mistruths. I have rebutted both of those sources, and I reposted one just a few posts above so it would be easier for you to find.

All Haga says is that Climate change is a hoax - he provides no good evidence. He uses str@wman arguments (like using an opinion piece in the New York Times titled "The End Of Snow" which was not written by a scientist) as an argument to show that scientists are wrong. Its ridiculous and is a childlike argument.

I have said before and I will say it again, provide me with some good scientific research/evidence pointing to a contrary view. This does mean showing me a letter published in a scientific journal with outdated information (I think it might have been you that posted that source, but I could be wrong). This does not mean showing me an article from a newspaper or magazine with ridiculous titles about there being no snow or whatever.

It seems I'm the only one playing by proper debating rules of citing the claims I make. Whether you accept them or not is up to you, but this is the real world, and you cant just reject them and claim everything is a hoax and a conspiracy.