Unscientific: Just because there happens to be no better explanation than X cannot lead to the indisputable conclusion that X is the determinant. It could be, but it could also not be.
How do we know all the factors that impact a planet's atmosphere?
And how do we measure all the factors that we think impact a planet's atmosphere?
And how do we back test all those measurements to establish historical controls?
And even if we could somehow know and measure all the factors, how big is the matrix that solves all the simultaneous equations that relate all the factors as functions of one another?
Forget about deriving the eigenvalues for that sort of problem; merely setting the problem up is an impossibility.
.
Unscientific: Just because there happens to be no better...
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 336 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Add WHC (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
$7.66 |
Change
0.000(0.00%) |
Mkt cap ! $6.408B | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| $7.75 | $7.78 | $7.56 | $22.18M | 2.904M |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | 10807 | $7.65 |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| $7.67 | 10040 | 3 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 16.10pm 19/06/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
| WHC (ASX) Chart |