Climate Change, page-968

Completely useless response. A positive feedback problem can't be resolved by a one-off event - there's been billions of perturbations in temperature.

You either didnt read, or didnt understand. I clearly explained everything. A positive feedback problem can certainly be resolved by a one off a event. Why cant it? This is in line with one of the most ridiculous assertions you've made. Have you got any proof to back your claim? I can give you an example of a positive feedback event stopping. Blood clots. A damaged blood vessel wall releases chemicals that initiate the formation of a blood clot. Every time the blood clot builds up more, more chemicals are released that speed up the process. The process gets faster and faster until the blood vessel wall is completely healed and the positive feedback loop has ended.

f* me, like...seriously. Just stop. You're embarrassing yourself.

You need to show that other negative feedbacks exist and dominate - but you don't want to do that because that would destroy your thesis.

Why? What has this got to do with the claim. Be specific with your point.

As for your radiative forcing graph I'm glad we now have a perfect predictor of temperature. I assume this is used to forecast the weather for every place and every day.

You'd assume incorrect.