climate cover-up: anatomy of denial, page-4

BB, you fail to ever consider that there are major propaganda machines working on each side screaming lunatic about their OPPONENTS! Obviously there is a major politically incentivised side to the AGW angle of the debate and a major privately funded angle behind the "deniers" side of the debate. Each side has to much too lose.

Why not try and keep a slightly open mind and not listen only to your TEAMS propaganda spin machine at work. Some people actually believe Rudd has done great work with the AS debate, IMO an obvious falsehood. Why not search for the opinion of scientists who have absolutely nothing to gain from expressing their opinion ie. funded by neither side. Maybe then you might understand why so many people are sceptical as the science is far from definitive.

IMO antagonistic language used by the pro AGW proponents is absolutely disgraceful. Demeaning people for their differing view is rather puerile.