I wonder just how smart some of the scientists are.
Climate change is due to a blanket of excessive carbon dioxide creating a greenhouse effect, right?
Carbon dioxide is a clear relatively inert gas, true?
So if we were to see a picture of the effect it would be clear, nothing to actually see, right?
Well reconcile this;
While an ABC climate change story was running yesterday, the background was showing grey pictures of severe pollution. The kind that is caused by excessive nitrous oxides, and poisonous sulphur dioxide, and carbon monoxide, that comes from factories, trucks and industry. Carbon dioxide is clear and inert, right, so it has no part, zero, in that kind of pollution. While it may or may not be responsible for climate change it has NOTHING to do with the grey pollution pictured on the ABC.
So why do that? Is it deliberate misrepresentation or what? The fraud is obvious to anyone who knows anything at all about chemistry, so the next question is, is their a hidden agenda here? If so, what is it?
