>.Climate Change DENIERS are obviously ill informed.
Yes, I strongly agree with this statement. Isn't it lucky for me I am not a "Climate Change DENIER"?
But, question. If you claim to be well informed, why do you struggle to even read my posts?
How can you be sure that you have adequately interpreted Scientific Reports if you can't parse two sentences? Hmmmmmm...
>Its Obvious by their assertions and claims, views that defy Scientific Reports.
Yes, you have views that defy science.
But you mean Science, your religion. Slight difference.
The greenhouse effect does not increase maximum noon surface temperatures.
You're welcome to try and provide any scientific, or even Scientific (your religious dogma) evidence that it does.
Because, if you read very carefully your religious texts, you will find that none make any claims about maximum temperatures.
Indeed, if you look at any plot, you will only see averages.
So, I am not really defying Science at all. Because Science makes no such claims