Let's say he does, should he pay more than he has to?
Let's say that the Clinton Foundation takes hundreds of millions and pays very little to charitable causes, should they pay more than they have to and have less for Chelsea's future?
Obviously if either candidate has broken the law then that is different.
It's up to the govt to close any loopholes in both cases.
- Forums
- Political Debate
- Clinton won the debate
Clinton won the debate, page-92
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 30 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Featured News
The Watchlist
LPM
LITHIUM PLUS MINERALS LTD.
Simon Kidston, Non Executive Director
Simon Kidston
Non Executive Director
Previous Video
Next Video
SPONSORED BY The Market Online