Well done Mineralised. Closest to the mark, although the high...

Well done Mineralised. Closest to the mark, although the high grade (>1.5g/t) in the model where most of the metal comes from looks very "blocky".




...and they didn't use the geological reasoning to build the wireframes:
"0.3 g/t Au and a 0.5 g/t Au grade shell were defined, guided by the results of an indicator kriging exercise. Strings were digitised on 50 m sections and linked to form the wireframes."

Top cuts are a bit "relaxed". You've got half gram dirt mixing with 25 gram dirt:
"Top-cuts were applied to the 2 m composites during estimation. Within the 0.30 to 0.50 g/t Au grade shell a top cut of 17.4 g/t Au was applied. Within the >0.50 g/t grade shell a top cut of 25.3 g/t Au was applied. For the laterite within the 0.30 to 0.50 g/t Au grade shell a top cut of 5.9 g/t Au was applied, and 6.5 g/t Au for the >0.50 g/t Au grade shell."