proofreader. I read a bit further into your rant. My debate with...

proofreader. I read a bit further into your rant. My debate with paul100 centred on my skepticism about costs. He believes costs will come down significantly (my words) when higher grades are mined. They should come down but I remain a skeptic on how far and whether they will come down far enough to return US$43mill EBITDA. By definition this is not an argument that has a winner until the next quarterly and possibly the one after that. And if you had read my posts completely you might have noted me remarking words to the effect that I am happy to be wrong because I'll make money.

Frankly you're triumphalism over who won an argument is a bit like your triumphalism over TMR.