Clover Moore Islamic Apologist

  1. 6,029 Posts.
    lightbulb Created with Sketch. 2
    What does it take for people like our Lord Mayor to understand the threat of a totalitarian Islamist ideology which is dedicated to establishing a worldwide Caliphate under Shariah law in preparation for the Final Battle against the kuffar.
    Whether it’s ISIS or al-Qaeda or Boko Haram, the ideology is the same, and it’s attracting millions of supporters around the world.
    It doesn’t help mainstream Australian Muslims to have deniers like Clover running cover for terrorists, or fanning a false sense of grievance and victimhood in their community.
    Sydneysiders don’t need the Lord Mayor to shield us from the truth to be cohesive and decent. The spontaneous crowds who went to Martin Place in the aftermath of the terrorist atrocity to pay their respects to the dead and show strength and unity in the face of terror are a silent rebuke to her insult.
    The biggest insult was the “Illridewithyou” hashtag that Clover lauded yesterday, claiming that after the siege, “Muslim women in particular felt fearful travelling on public transport and there was this spontaneous hashtag “I’ll ride with you” and there were thousands and thousands and thousands of tweets. That’s who we are.”
    No. The hashtag was the worst leftist fraud, defending theoretical victims of Islamophobia while the real victims were still hostages of a violent Islamist. Did the hash-tivists not realise the hostages were still in mortal danger?

    Another lefty/Greenie Nutter

    The Greens candidate who began it all with tweet on a train in Brisbane had imagined the incident that sparked the hashtag.
    Rachael Jacobs had been reading about the Sydney siege on her phone when she saw a woman in front of her fiddling with her headscarf, a sign she immediately decided was fear of Islamophobia.

    So she tweeted her compassion for “victims of the siege who were not in the cafe”.
    She never spoke to the woman and said later: “She might not even be Muslim or she could have just been warm”.
    It was obscene moral posturing, endorsed and promoted by Clover, in a direct inversion of the truth.
    “The very real risk that the siege might set off a chain reaction of tit-for-tat attacks on Muslim Australians, fanned by tabloid columnists, was quickly dampened by our multicultural, harmonious society,” she said.
    There were never going to be tit for tat attacks on Muslims, just as there weren’t after the two other ISIS-inspired terrorist attacks
    in Australia in the last 15 months.
    The Left’s opportunistic incitement of Muslim victimhood is divisive and dangerous.

    Much More here

    http://m.dailytelegraph.com.au/rend...sm-they-say-sure/story-fnpug1jf-1227646461676
 
arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch. arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch.