Australia's largest stock trading and investment forum Australia's #1 stock forum

I agree. I make my point above.harsh though? its a pity the Labs...

First 9 Last

Share
Profile

Follow
Scott th Ratbag

57,861 Posts.

664

28/05/24

23:04

Post #: 74053629
Share

Originally posted by Treefern: ↑

I think that's a bit harsh, Scott. We could probably agree that a lot of the questions aren't ones you or I would ask, but in this day and age of corruption and just complete stupidity, I don't mind a politican taking it upon themselves to avail themselves of the resources of the Public Service to scrutinise anything that a Government does in the name of its people.

Transparency takes man-hours, Scott. They could be wasting their time doing far worse things.

Expand

I agree. I make my point above.

harsh though? its a pity the Labs weren't scrutinising the LNP expenses better. they could have been much more aware.

as in all things treefer, imo there is a sensible limit.
1 Upvote

Reply

Top Stories

RML

Resolution looks to 'strong historical data' as Horse Heaven search begins

ASX Market Open: Oz shares dip back (very slightly) after Wed's record close | July 3

Trump chides Powell as Goldman call for calm. The RBA must be nervous

Listen: HotCopper Wire Podcast 016 – FY25 ended up not so bad... but Trump unpause is coming

CBA

CBA down as BHP goes up – what's going on, and, will CBA stocks correct?

First 9 Last

SPONSORED BY