"The major reasons why they are opposed to the deal include the too-high valuation of the asset manager, which at $230m they perceive to be four times the market value and the too-low valuation of the assets contributed."
The obviously have been reading HC. Thanks Defabs and others for educating the big boys. If that article is correct (a big if these days) then the YES vote seems to be screwed.
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- CER
- cnp problems galore
cnp problems galore, page-3
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 1 more message in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)