Thanks! I also have researched a little:
Peter Voigt owns shares in thecompany amounting to 200,000 euros. That is less than 2 percent ofthe company. He earns more as CEO than he holds in the company.
My theory: He turned the company into money, by taking it public (can any one verify this?).
His stake in the company is minimal. His function as CEO serves noself-economic interests and is of emotional nature.
In case of a stock dilution, he incurs no loss. But I think he would never let anybody (eg Friedland) take itprivate. If he had wanted that, he would have sold directly to friedland instead of taking it public.
Any objections to my theory?
Thanks! I also have researched a little: Peter Voigt owns shares...
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 133 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Add CNQ (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
23.5¢ |
Change
0.000(0.00%) |
Mkt cap ! $16.97M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| 23.5¢ | 24.0¢ | 22.5¢ | $6.388K | 26.70K |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | 24521 | 23.5¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| 24.0¢ | 61700 | 1 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 15.53pm 09/08/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
| CNQ (ASX) Chart |