"co-incidences"..?, page-141

K...

"Just because ESI blew $15 mill"

Factually Wrong. ECT Fortrend drawdown was about $1.6m only...$15m V ~$1.6m...

Wildly inaccurate statement again K.

"Did that $15 mill ever get used for the 2,000 T test burn? Sorry, forgot myself, dwelling in the past again ;0)"

Re the PAST which 90% of your posts content relates to -

How many of the CURRENT directors were directors in the Fortrend period (Sept 2007 - Dec 2008)?

NONE

Which means your posts are 90% irrelevent to begin with. So the period prior to ~Aug last year is largely irrelevent...New Board/new MD July/Aug 2011 (apart from Mr Carter...May 2009) - so any talk about the prior periods is pure and utter downramping.

Keep up K....with all that time on your hands surely you could have researched the Fortrend period before posting.

And re your Fortrend V CSI comments - dress it up as you wish...but we all know a CSI is vastly more desirable than a drawdown facility. In you research of ESI Top 40s in the Fortrend period did you see Fortrend in there? Nope because they are like LJC...they dump the lot.