"TATA won't accept sulphur levels of greater than 0.6% and MNM have geotech cores showning up 4.5% sulphur content..."
Is this a fact?
Or speculatory?
If fact, it almost ensures that ESI are a couple/few/several years ahead of where their rivals purport to be, commercially speaking.
I'd like to know the facts for sure, thx for the lead.
L
"co-incidences"..?, page-190
Add ECT (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
0.2¢ |
Change
0.000(0.00%) |
Mkt cap ! $6.343M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| 0.2¢ | 0.2¢ | 0.2¢ | $103 | 51.27K |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 56 | 22837550 | 0.2¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| 0.3¢ | 17697152 | 57 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 12.30pm 01/11/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
| ECT (ASX) Chart |