Australia's largest stock trading and investment forum Australia's #1 stock forum

Why don't you explain with "hard evidence" how the 3% human CO2...

First 11 Last

Share
Profile

Follow
shaneos

7,003 Posts.

690

03/07/24

17:34

Post #: 74592798
Share

Originally posted by Scott th Ratbag ↑

there is hard evidence for GHG emissions and global warming. therefore its not "religious". this is far more apt to describe the denialism which rejects evidence based on the blind faith in the ministers of anti-science on SAD.

now, as others have asked, please explain how Co2 is not a GHG.

Expand

Why don't you explain with "hard evidence" how the 3% human CO2 emissions (97% natural)...allegedly cause "global warming"?

Last edited by shaneos: 03/07/24
3 Upvote

Reply

Top Stories

Week 44 Wrap: Relatively boring week ahead of US election; HotCopper's most watched; Oz inflation at 3.5%

Bitcoin hits fresh record as instos pile into BTC ETFs – and Trump helps, too

MIN

Ellison slapped with $20M sanction from MinRes but will stay on as leader – for now

Palladium's the newest geopolitical hot commodity. But ASX exposure is limited

MIN

Movers and Shakers: Zip Co, MinRes, Kuniko, more – The week's top ASX gainers

There are more pages in this discussion • 6 more messages in this thread...

First 11 Last