@mjp2
I am sure you remember who is the DIRECTOR of the Centre for CLIMATE SCIENCES at NASA! Yes Australia's very own Graeme Stephens.
Now what did he have to say about CLOUD feedbacks back in 2010. Here is a quote from Sciencedirect
Calculating the balance between the cooling or warming effect of clouds and the warming effect of greenhouse gases is a complex problem for researchers, given their current understanding of clouds on Earth. And it's just one of many questions Stephens and fellow scientists are working to address with observations from CloudSat, an experimental satellite built and managed by NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena, Calif. CloudSat's goal is to learn about clouds and their effect on climate by studying them from space.
Here is another RIPPER from NASA back in 2010
Graeme Stephens: Clouds are a lot more complicated than carbon dioxide in the atmosphere because they affect sunlight, they affect infrared radiation and the greenhouse effect. These effects are very complicated and in many ways, they compensate each other.
Stephens said that when scientists learn how clouds interact with other forces in the atmosphere, models predicting future climate will become much more accurate.
So back in 2010 NASA CLEARLY were STILL in two minds. Were Clouds a negative feedback or a Positive feedback.
Yet we have TURKEYS telling us the science is settled.
And the 97% of scientist that the cartoonist checked out the work on must NOW have egg on their face. Their is NOTHING settled about the climate models and the science.
NOAA and NASA have said so!
