No, I've not disagreed with Stephen's or NOAA and NASA's comments. Because that is not my intention. And not doing so does not make me out as a fraud as you so colourfully, mistakenly, irrationally and stupidly claim.
I've just pointed out that your interpretation of those comments is mindless and lacks any understanding of the broader context and science findings on this. And I've pointed out that Stephens, and I'll add NOAA and NASA, all strongly affirm the IPCC's findings about warming and climate change and the dangers of that.
The issues that Stephen's speaks to on improving our measurement and understanding of variation in water vapour does not change those organisations' and Stephens views on climate change. They understand the context and significance of those comments where you palpably do not.
You are off your rocker with your false interpretation of this.
