Who'd be surprised ehBoth drought and flooding, as scientists...

First 4355 Last

Share
Profile

Follow
mjp2

10,515 Posts.

207

15/10/19

17:46

Post #: 40893812
Share

Originally posted by aatisket: ↑

Well go and scour the IPCC reports yourself and put your own opinion on what they espouse. I usually find the "need for context" is a sign that you've really got nothing to offer.

You've twisted and turned the great lakes discussion to highlight nothing at all. There is a mountain of reports and grim predictions of drying and then floods due to climate change. My point has always been that there was a panic about drying and then a panic about flooding and both were linked to climate change. I'd allow that if this was only one such example, but that is not the case. It has been the tale of the past 50 years.

I have children and extended family, I'm concerned about future generations just like the next person. However, I have seen this climate change discussion go on since I was a child and it has grown into a political cash cow. That people now support the idea of criminalising the "denier" point of view tells it all really.

Expand

Who'd be surprised eh

Both drought and flooding, as scientists predict

And, yourself, another dude who cannot find any reference to support what you claim the IPCC says. And you want me to search it out. You think I was born yesterday? And you think I haven't read enough of the IPCC reports to not know that you are talking hogwash?

And you are caught out by others who provide the correct quote

You wouldn't be Russian, would you ...

Now we get the snowflake. You say people support criminalising the denier point of view do they? You mean some people? Like some people deny science. Harden up snowflake.

You've dished a thread full of BS about what climate scientists say, totally misrepresent an argument, and then squeal about how tough you imagine the world might be on you. Go cry me a river.
1 Upvote

Reply