CO2 smashing extreme weather records, page-5945

First 5945 Last

Share
Profile

Follow
mjp2

10,521 Posts.

207

02/07/20

16:49

Post #: 45605118
Share

Originally posted by nippy: ↑

Got it first time around - the BOM themselves say averages cant be used for some things but must be used for others - their answer varies with the narrative desired....

Averages mislead as does outlier data depending upon the context.

Your article mentions how pre 1910 data is excluded - funny how that data excluded eliminates the desired upward trend if included. You accept these various reasons far far far too easily - ie Australians around the country all fraudulently recorded their temperatures back in 1886 on the basis you don't like the thermometers used. It is not even considered that all of that data could have understated the temperatures. ie no urban heating effect back then! Yet urban heating is ignored by you but this alone can be the reason for the tiny change claimed.

I never said to merge the data - quite the opposite. Comprehension skills lacking big time with you!

I said to leave the data alone alltogether.

If data is missing then it is missing. Dont fiddle with things and leave yourself open to charges of fraud. Common sense really.

Expand

Well, you've missed the point altogether.

Which does not surprise me.

Your ideas about what is right and wrong with this aren't well thought out or understood. Sorry about that. Maybe it is beyond you. But the world's scientists know more than you do.

And Marohasy knows how to hoodwink you. Whether you appreciate that's what is going on or not.
1 Upvote

Reply