You have no argument against the science. Just a number of over the top statements from 'personalities' and a couple of errors that the IPCC and the science did not support.
The fact you harp on with the same old things just shows how bereft of anything significant you are. I'd be happy if you came up with something. That is partly why I am here, to check there is not something I am missing. But the same old arguments that hold no water are tedious repetition from a camp that has nothing.
