One of the questions the alarmists never ever answer is "Why, if...

First 6219 Last

Share
Profile

Follow
BugGold

3,107 Posts.

1

18/08/20

17:43

Post #: 46631519
Share

Originally posted by nippy: ↑

The scientists I back are the ones that regard those that change the data as outright fraudsters.

Bank robbers have excuses for robbing banks - their is no legitimate excuse.

Only poor IQ types fail to see the inherent problems with bias....... in its many forms...... once you allow changes for any reason.

I will give you a bit of a clue....

cant use 1886 data

graph starts from 1914

Another graph starts from 1950's

On top of that alter the data over and over and also make it hard to access and find

Stifle or totally eliminate debate by barring opposing views

Round up a record cold temperature ( blame the equipment which is later retracted as it was a human decision to impose the bias on the coding ) then also close down that station all together...

All of these various legitimisations highlight bias in some way and show were departures from the truth can be allowed in.

No clearer example than fear mongering about sea level rises being a danger to the GBR when in actual fact it would not exist at all without it. Any you try to claim I am the one with the warped logic.

Expand

One of the questions the alarmists never ever answer is "Why, if the data is so compelling, does it need to be misrepresented?" and of course the logical follow up to that is "Why, considering the misrepresentations are so damaging, is not something done to prevent them?"

All you ever get is a "What misrepresentations?" like you've caught a five year old with his hand in the cookie jar.
2 Upvote

Reply