Australia's largest stock trading and investment forum Australia's #1 stock forum

You are on a roll stirring up false doubt, Oh i am sorry. How...

First 2177 Last

Share
Profile

Follow
jopo

15,299 Posts.

08/08/19

09:29

Post #: 39916417
Share

Originally posted by mjp2 ↑

The science is never settled. There is always more to learn.

But not being clear about the complexities of cloud feedback is not the same as not having models that already successfully predict observed temperatures.
And nor does it negate the evidence from multiple studies on clouds not solving the problem of warming.

You are on a roll stirring up false doubt, It's what you do. But we know it's warming, we know that warming is becoming dangerous and we know what we can do about it.

I don;t have a problem with the statements made. I have a problem with your, as ever, OTT, ignorant of context and other studies, and plain stupid interpretation of them.

You are showing yourself to be a blinkered fool. That's fine with me. Keep it up.

Expand

You are on a roll stirring up false doubt,

Oh i am sorry. How else is one to interpret comments from NOAA and NASA

NASA's DIRECTOR of the Centre for CLIMATE SCIENCES

NASA said
Graeme Stephens: Clouds are a lot more complicated than carbon dioxide in the atmosphere because they affect sunlight, they affect infrared radiation and the greenhouse effect. These effects are very complicated and in many ways, they compensate each other.

NOAA said

"we have very little comprehension of the complexity of the feedback loops."

"The feedback loop in which water is involved is critically important to projecting future climate change, but as yet is still fairly poorly measured and understood."
2 Upvote

Reply