Sorry but a judge finding excuses to not look at the report made...

First 2180 Last

Share
Profile

Follow
nippy

10,093 Posts.

662

08/08/19

10:09

Post #: 39917672
Share

Originally posted by mjp2: ↑

NZ NIWA won that case in court and were awarded costs.

You seem to be living in a world of misinformation.

http://hot-topic.co.nz/cranks-lose-court-case-against-nz-temperature-record-niwa-awarded-costs/

And the two "experts" that your "mob" put forward were commented on by the judge as follows
"
Section 25 could only apply if Mr Dunleavy was an expert in the particular area of the science of meteorology and/or climate. He is not. He has no applicable qualifications. His interest in the area does not sufficiently qualify him as an expert. I also accept Mr Smith’s further point that Mr Dunleavy’s views are not capable of offering substantial help to this Court on the issue that it has to determine. To that extent I agree that substantial passages of Mr Dunleavy’s evidence are inadmissible.
Similar issues (as to the limited nature of his expertise), apply to the evidence of Mr Dedekind.
[54]… Mr Dedekind’s general expertise in basic statistical techniques does not extend to any particular specialised experience or qualifications in the specific field of applying statistical techniques in the field of climate science. To that extent, where Mr Dedekind purports to comment or give opinions as to NIWA’s application of statistical techniques in those fields, his evidence is of little assistance to the Court.
"

Sorry bud, but you've been fed manure.

Expand

Sorry but a judge finding excuses to not look at the report made by BOM ( who do have statistics expertise ) does not cut it.

The fact remains they fought tooth and nail and risked jail rather than let the details of that report see the light of day.

Maybe I am being naïve and the report would have said the NZ climate mob should be awarded saint hoods and they were too modest to let that be shown.
2 Upvote

Reply