You have not posted anything that refutes NASA's position on...

You have not posted anything that refutes NASA's position on feedback. You are a blatant fraud mjp. You are a CHARLATAN.

What you have posted is a IPCC lead author commenting that the IPCC have further refined the new AR5 IPCC Annual report and that the planet is warming.

So what?

There is no mention at all on climate modeling and water vapour. You are hoodwinking fellow sheeple

NOAA and NASA are in agreement in regards to NET effect of Water vapour feedback


"we have very little comprehension of the complexity of the feedback loops."

"The feedback loop in which water is involved is critically important to projecting future climate change, but as yet is still fairly poorly measured and understood."

and

Graeme Stephens: Clouds are a lot more complicated than carbon dioxide in the atmosphere because they affect sunlight, they affect infrared radiation and the greenhouse effect. These effects are very complicated and in many ways, they compensate each other.


PS Graeme Stephens in 2013 reiterated the above.