So they are spending $500m on the trial to fail are they? Please explain how this falls apart when you dig a little deeper. They are talking about doing it in a carbon friendly way, how can that not be a good thing for our country and economy. Staggering that you can’t see any positives in that.
Are you against the benefit of technology to use coal even if there is zero emissions?
Your renewalables can’t even power our energy requirements and you seem to think they could be used to produce hydrogen at a commercial level.
Here is a question for you, what is the plan for end of life solar panels? There are 2 million homes in Australia with solar panels that will have to be replaced at some stage but so far there is no plan for what to do with the dangerous elements contained in solar panels. Does it not surprise you that no plan has ever been considered on this front, they push out these panels and have no idea of the impact down the track.
