coal seam gas a risk, jp morgan says , page-16

Now, now Sathy, don't be modest - it wasn't just random chance that you knew about Santos' cap raising ahead of the announcement. Here is what you said:

"STO desparate for money must raise big $(2bn)ASAP!Underwriters is JPMorgran so not suprise they are trying to push SP up up .............
Sourse:AFR" 28/8/2010

Fairly specific, Sathy. "Underwirter is JP Morgan." Now, that isn't general speculation.

Also bizarre behaviour for someone who says they hold STO - trying to spread rumours of an imminent capital raising. Either you are a fool, going out of you way to downramp your own share with fears of a cheaper cap raising, or you have an agenda.

And just in case any STO holder missed your first post, you then rammed home the point 3 more times in quick succession, under the heading "cr coming soon for $13!":

"KOGAS & Sinopec deal is bit old news -STO want their SP up & up so they can ask market for 2bn CR- Watch the space. 30/8/2010

"Can't you see how STO trying to push-up their SP by throwing media relase (even today another one)! Watch the space all going to happen soon! They need gas and they need to takeover ESG -any need big money for all GLNG Drama!"
30/8/2010

"The bankers are all attempting to convince the gas company's boss, David Knox, they deserve a slice of the action in a forthcoming rights issue that could raise more than $2 billion.

Santos is in the final stages of deals that will make Korea's state-owned gas giant KOGAS and China's Sinopec customers, shareholders and financiers of plans to spend up to $16bn building two LNG trains on Curtis Island, north of Gladstone.

http://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/investment-bankers-eye-santos-raising/story-e6frg8zx-1225913015066" 2/9/2010

I also particularly like how your broken English comes in and out. Have a look at how eloquent that last STO downramp was, compared with your usual persona of very broken English. It looks like your slip was showing a bit there, Sathy!

Sorry Sathy. You have zero credibility. None. Your posts don't match your holding. You are just a little too motivated to post on shares you don't own. Your crude attempt to create a persona of very poor English comes and goes. All your posts do is reinforce the idea that there is plenty of corporate involvement on HC and in ESG in particular, and plenty of interest in majors acquiring more gas.

Back to corporate media school for you Sathy.

Yaq