I located and read the article which I had not previously. An interesting argument based on the the material presented by the author in the context of the renewable industry. I can't accept the argument as the end of the ongoing discussion about nuclear vs renewables as a reason to abandon nuclear yet as much needs to be clarified in the context of what, where and how the proposal is to be considered. A simple let's substitute coal with nuclear as a means
to ending the energy and climate issues is I agree not an acceptable proposition in the current energy crisis. let's see what evidence the nuclear supporters can provide to support their case and answer their critics instead of having emotive outbursts driving the agenda.
- Forums
- Political Debate
- Coalition nuclear plan would force consumers to wait 20 years longer for 30% higher electricity bills
Coalition nuclear plan would force consumers to wait 20 years longer for 30% higher electricity bills, page-36
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 4 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Featured News
The Watchlist
I88
INFINI RESOURCES LIMITED
Charles Armstrong, CEO
Charles Armstrong
CEO
SPONSORED BY The Market Online