My comments on you not having put up anything substantive other...

My comments on you not having put up anything substantive other than hot air related to your sea level and bangladesh assertions,

But on the clouds thing ..
Hey. You are funny. I said the paper on clouds was fine, obviously it is, but it is just part of the big picture.

plenty of other work on clouds has pointed in other directions
so sure, good paper, lets see where it fits in the overall body of work
also the paper is narrow bounded
it does not comment on any quantification of the impact their findings might have on future projections and models
it does not look at anywhere other than one north american site and also over a limited time period

so yes, pretty useful paper
let's see if it can be repeated elsewhere and what the expected size of impact this might have if it was repeatable over a wider geography
maybe different results apply over oceans, deserts, forests?

yet you jump into a lather about how this seems to contradict all the science to date. hardly. Settle down!

Despite your assertions the IPCC work so far has pretty accurately predicted sea level rise and temperature rise. So the models would seem to not be too far off.
That paper is definitely interesting, but I think you are making a mountain out of a molehill.