blair wants to wait? blair will lose.

  1. dub
    33,892 Posts.
    lightbulb Created with Sketch. 350
    Hello,

    It's being reported that Blair now wants to wait some months to allow time for UN sanction to attack Iraq. (I suspect that's only because there is a large and growing public opposition in the UK to an early 'pre-emptive' attack, since he's seemed to me to be red hot to trot up until now.)

    I don't think he's got a snowball's chance in hell of delaying the attack.

    I believe that the Bush administration has to act soon. Massive money has been spent in getting the US legions ready and positioned, and I firmly believe Bush (et al) can't afford to wait much longer - neither because of the massive costs involved in holding position, nor because of the political risk of letting the US economic mess become the prime concern of the American folk.

    I think the US will attack Iraq before this month is done.

    I also think there is more than one reason why the US is going to do what it is. I don't think any of them is because Iraq threatens the USA.

    ... and please note how I've personalised all of this. It's just what I think. I'm not swearing that it's right. I just believe it is.

    And here's 2 late CNS news articles which perhaps are relevant.


    ******************************************
    U.S. troops arrive in Gulf quietly
    Friday, January 10, 2003 Posted: 7:30 AM HKT (2330 GMT)

    KUWAIT CITY, Kuwait (AP) -- American troop reinforcements come to Kuwait daily in the biggest military buildup in the region since the Gulf War -- but it's hard to tell.

    After heavy media coverage of their departure from bases in the United States this week, complete with teary embraces with relatives and their views of possible war with Iraq, the soldiers are landing in Kuwait in near secrecy.

    The U.S. government is engaged in a juggling act -- advertising loudly to Saddam Hussein that he faces the threat of massive force if he fails to give up weapons of mass destruction, while trying to keep a low profile in the gulf region to ease local sensitivities.

    The balance is highly visible -- or perhaps invisible -- in Kuwait, the largest forward staging area for a potential U.S. ground invasion of southern Iraq.

    Troops from the Army's 3rd Infantry Division, based at Fort Stewart, Georgia, this week have been arriving at a military base near Kuwait City's international airport, part of a deployment that will ultimately bring the division's entire 17,000 troops to the region.

    Reporters have been forbidden from entering the Kuwaiti base to film or interview the arriving troops. Convoys of buses guarded by machine gun-equipped Humvees and police cars shepherd the Americans to their camps, which are generally closed to the media.

    U.S. military spokesmen have confirmed the arrivals are taking place, but will not discuss numbers or units.

    "We're not discussing force flows," said Capt. David Connolly, an Army public affairs officer. "We're telling people we're redeploying forces around the world to support the war on terrorism, and that's it."

    The military worries the deployment -- involving tens of thousands of soldiers and Marines, as well as Navy battle groups and Air Force units around the region -- might be seen as indicating an invasion is imminent.

    That decision, officials stress, lies with President Bush and the buildup is only to give him forces at his disposal if he judges military action must be used to rid Iraq of weapons of mass destruction.

    Kuwait was uncomfortable when journalists covering the Army's biggest live-fire exercise since the Gulf War reported comments and took pictures of troops stating their readiness for war -- such as a tank with a cannon painted with the words, "All The Way to Baghdad."

    Since then, at rare opportunities to meet the troops at Christmas and New Year's or at a boxing tournament, public affairs officers have asked reporters -- and told the soldiers -- to focus on the celebrations, not war speculation.

    At the same time, in reaction to criticism over reporters' lack of access to the 1991 Gulf War, the military is trying to allow more opportunities for coverage.

    Kuwait owes its freedom from Iraqi occupation to the U.S.-led coalition that drove out Saddam's military in 1991. The country has hosted a brigade-sized U.S. deterrent force since. Authorities have been staging civil defense drills to prepare the population in case Saddam fires Scud missiles at American positions or at civilian centers.

    Ayed al-Mannah, a Kuwaiti political analyst, said the American buildup does embarrass Kuwait, "but the justification is clear: We have no other choice but to support the Americans. Saddam didn't leave us any other choice."

    He noted that there is a U.S. military buildup in other countries, but believes the media are concentrating on Kuwait because it borders Iraq.

    "Some believe that Kuwait wants revenge, but this is not correct," al-Mannah said. "There is a sort of unjustified dense media coverage. The war hasn't even started."

    Around the region, U.S. military personnel try to keep a low profile to accommodate local sensitivities, and troops seldom wear uniforms off base.

    Acting under instructions from the State Department, U.S. naval officers in Bahrain will discuss ships at sea in detail, but will not respond to questions about the 5th Fleet's headquarters in the Bahraini capital, Manama.

    U.S. Air Force officers in Qatar will describe how their planes refuel fighter jets over Afghanistan, but journalists cannot visit Al-Udeid Air Base, where the planes are based.

    ****************************************
    B-1 bombers deployed to Persian Gulf
    From Mike Mount
    CNN
    Thursday, January 9, 2003 Posted: 11:08 PM HKT (1508 GMT)

    WASHINGTON (CNN) -- Three U.S. Air Force B-1 bombers have left their South Dakota bases for deployment in the Persian Gulf region for possible military action over Iraq, U.S. Air Force officials said.

    The bombers, which departed Wednesday, were the first of many that can be deployed from Ellsworth Air Force Base in South Dakota.

    Ellsworth is home to 26 of the sleek, supersonic B-1 Lancers capable of carrying dozens of bombs, including precision-guided weapons.

    Air Force officials said that within the next week several other B-1s will deploy to the U.S. Central Command region and more than 500 Air Force personnel from Ellsworth will follow.

    Many of those deployed will be B-1 flight crew members and support personnel.

    B-1s were used extensively during the war in Afghanistan, and they have been a part of the Air Force arsenal since 1988.

    They were not used in combat until Operation Desert Fox, four days of air and missile strikes launched by the United States and Britain in December 1998 following Saddam Hussein's prohibition of the return of U.N. weapons inspectors to Iraq.

    Originally, the B-1 was designed to deliver nuclear weapons at long range.


    ***************************************

    bye.dub

 
arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch. arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch.