comment, page-4

Would that be intellectual property, Axegun?

The NTA comes from the Half Yearly/Annual Report. I'd guess it represents Capex that has gone into developing our suite of products to the stage of development where multiple parties are showing real interest in partnering us to the final stage of development, being full commercialisation.

I'd guess it also comes from Sean O'Dwyer's comments a while back when he said, from memory, that MST's IP was once worth a billion dollars, and nothing has changed. However that's a more esoteric proposition.

Lee Finniear said recently that it takes a degree of mental toughness to be in the position they are in and continue forwards towards the goals they are trying to achieve.

I think this attitude applies equally to the likes of Winston Doyle and Dutchess, as well as the various parties we are partnered with, as it does the executive.

I can only speak for, myself, but I think it would be good if some shareholders and posters on this thread displayed the same mental toughness as the executive, because without it we would be long gone.

If there was any one argument to suggest things are not as bad as they seem, it would be the fact of the noteholders granting the extension. The SP of any company is open to manipulation. MST is no exception. Arguably it is more open to it because the stakes are so high.

I don't know what the final outcome for MST is going to be be, but failure is not it. IMO.