What is more important and significant of course is why do we...

What is more important and significant of course is why do we even know anything about Gillard's sexual history...

It seems to be only of interest since it represents an rather extreme outlier of what is normally acceptable behaviour and personal conduct in any community across the world...


These days this sort of bed-hopping seems to be acceptable among the "not worried/dont care about STD/let the good times roll" underclass of the community...

But what is generally not acceptable is what seems to be a pattern of serially targetting married men where the likely outcome is extreme family misery and arguments, marriage breakups, messy divorces and deeply traumatized children...

But it comes back to the more important issue of why do we even know anything about these apparent serial "relationships" with married men?

Someone must have been bragging about it, and I am guessing it was not the series of married men involved who after all had the most to lose from their disgraceful behaviour becoming public knowledge...

That does leave a small list of suspects left...