FBR is much closer to large commercialization than ICON,
Can ICON get a contract to build 200,000 houses a year?
The only advantage of building by 3D printers is the cost savings, and FBR offers a product that will save more on costs, eliminating the need to change the standard structure.
3D printed houses have no advantages other than savings, and as soon as FBR brings greater savings, they are no longer attractive.
ICON can only achieve construction niches.
In contrast, FBR, once they prove the effectiveness, which they have already proven, they can easily get contracts for hundreds of thousands of houses a year,
There is nothing at all to compare between FBR and ICON,
I hope ICON will be listed on Nasdaq, it will greatly help the exposure of FBR.
FBR is much closer to large commercialization than ICON,Can ICON...
Add FBR (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
2.5¢ |
Change
0.000(0.00%) |
Mkt cap ! $111.0M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| 2.5¢ | 2.5¢ | 2.4¢ | $10.08K | 404.6K |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 13 | 2542433 | 2.4¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| 2.5¢ | 2108303 | 9 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 15.15pm 07/06/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
|
|||||
|
Last
2.4¢ |
Change
0.000 ( 4.00 %) |
||||
| Open | High | Low | Volume | ||
| 2.4¢ | 2.5¢ | 2.4¢ | 314724 | ||
| Last updated 15.58pm 07/06/2024 ? | |||||
| FBR (ASX) Chart |