Competitive landscape, page-998

What a ridiculous analysis.

Just writing "inferior" next to something does not make it so.

1. So you believe all these other companies and the investors supporting them are throwing their money down the drain?
2. Why are all these companies entering into collaborations and attempting to commercialise things if Akida is just superior?
3. Why has Akida generated next to no revenue (especially for a company with an almost $2 billion market cap) since their IP first became available?
4. Why did Grai Matter Labs have $1 million in pre-orders for its chip if Akida is superior? Why did everyone not just use Akida given it was available first?
5. Why did Renesas enter into an Agreement with competitor Syntiant to develop Voice-Controlled Multimodal AI Solution Combining Advanced Vision and Voice Technologies, 7 months after it had licensed Akida IP? Why did it not use Akida for this?
6. Why did SynSense and Prophesee enter into a collaboration to develop ultra-low-power solutions for implementing intelligence on the edge for event-based vision applications? Why did Prophesee not choose Akida?
7. Why did MegaChips take a stake in another company which is pursuing AI inference processing IC for edge devices, after it had already signed an agreement with BrainChip? Why did it not just use Akida?

I could go on...