Competitors, page-6

First 6 Last

Share
Profile

Follow
verce

7,518 Posts.

847

24/04/18

17:28

Post #: 32663827
Share

Originally posted by edshann ↑

Verce I appreciate your posts, but the issue here is what competition there is for our product.

I did not suggest Shine On would "inevitably monopolise the industry". I have shares in VIV and as far as I am aware Shine On is not listed, so it is not a matter of which is the better investment. It is about how quickly VIV is likely grow its business.

Do we lose potential customers to Shine On? Do the existence of firms just installing LED explain the slow take up of our smart lighting technology? Yes our product may be better, but does the extra cost involved in intelligent lighting mean customers are going elsewhere? It is a basic question about how we compete for customers. Why is everyone not beating down our door to install smart lighting given the savings? Is it they can get most of the savings just by installing much cheaper LED lighting without all the bells and whistles. What type of customers use us and who just installs LED lights?

I am not running down VIV, just trying to understand the business model as any investor should try to do.

I have emailed Sam Marks to see if he will provide some answers.

Expand

Hi Ed

All excellent questions! Hopefully this quarterly and the June quarterly provide the confirmation we are looking for in terms of scale-up.

Have you heard back from Sam Marks yet? Can you share the gist of the email if so?

Cheers,
verce

VIV Price at posting: 5.4¢ Sentiment: Buy Disclosure: Held
Upvote

0 Great analysis

Reply

Top Stories

Bitcoin jumps 8% to beat record on Trump vote optimism

Palladium's the newest geopolitical hot commodity. But ASX exposure is limited

SI6

Nanocap Si6 Metals to kick off drilling at Monument gold project WA, chasing past hits

MKT

The ASX can overlook its Telecomm small-caps. Here’s one diversified brand with an international footprint

LRD

Lord picks up high-grade copper play in Western Australia, with past intercepts of up to 6.62%