Actually, the problem is too many "pie in the sky" unsubstantiated assumptions that BP is involved by overoptimistic holders based on zero evidence - and put forward as facts.
Meeting primary objectives means that the trials were not failures and these mirror previous trials. Certainly, would not read anything more than that.
A webinar presentation is not going to add to that - basically, an investor presentation and I would agree with a lot of posters today who have linked a future CR with the timing of the presentation.
Not very clever to suggest that they are all wrong and you are right about anything. Bottomline is that none of us can see into the future. So, none of us know the outcome in the next few months. We can speculate and make educated guesses - hopefully, based on rational thought processes based on real evidence.
Whether you hold or not would not determine what you actually know. Non-holders are not emotionally invested and don't get desperate and that does give them an advantage.
Actually, the problem is too many "pie in the sky"...
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 40 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
