quindalup would have attended the webinar, if he actually did,...

quindalup would have attended the webinar, if he actually did, after posting that post you replied to GrahamCC.

having a quick look over your webinar slides..i was 'pleasantly suprised' to see that pictures of the three main pigs were posted on most of the slides and the credentials of all three clearly promoted.

In the pursuit of honest disclosure for better understanding of your arguement and position in relation to, your arguement and position on PPX. Can you tell parties to these PPX threads what your point of entry was into the investment in PXUPA and if you know the point of entry of the other two pigs whose pictures were posted on most of the webinar slides or their related parties?

This will give us interested parties some perspective on your positions, otherwise we would just go and make wild assumptions.

"This turnaround of PaperlinX is being driven by a Board and its close supporters NONE of whom have ANY proven experience in running a troubled multinational industrial company.

Not one of them.

Individually talented, undoubtedly, but do they have the right talents for the task at hand?"

Graham would you agree that all of them NOW have some experience?

I would also like to point to what i believe is a factual error contained within slide 35 and one i think the PIGS are trying to establish a right to rather than uphold.

the value of PXUPA is NOT FIXED at $100 it is CAPPED at $100. this is whats leading the PIGS to the absurd assumption that PXUPA have a 80% majority equity interest.