Australia's largest stock trading and investment forum Australia's #1 stock forum

FFX

0.00%

20.0¢ firefinch limited

Confirmation of Battery Grade Concentrate, page-19

First 19 Last

Share
Profile

Follow
Aliasdavejay

4,366 Posts.

543

16/02/21

23:20

Post #: 51055218
Share

Originally posted by rainbowdaisy: ↑

the whole world? Or just your world?

its no wonder Daz Tweets such a question because,

The FFX DFS makes no mention of “battery grade”, not even the market for BG lithium hydroxide / carbonate rates a distinct mention

it makes one mention of chemical grade attribution in JORC table.

In JORC table section the company claims the metallurgical process for Goulamina is standard practice. But how can that be? From hard rock ore to WOF “froth flotation” looks quite novel, as far as I can see among established peers. Tailings can not be considered standard practice in my estimate. And, to top it off, as I’ve said if its battery grade, then there should be no problem pulling out lithia testwork data (lithium sulphate mono hydrate/oxide samples) from the downstream scoping study as it uses the same highly specialised morphology SC6, as in MET tests and so DFS assumptions.

The company hasn’t made room for penalties. I mean is it standard to ship 350ktpa Spod at wetness @ 12-15%? Fast markets is conceptualisinf <10%. I suppose dewatering will happen as the ship sails.

yes yes...optimisation for transport was mentioned but this should not read as an afterthought?? We are talking serious bottleneck with dewatering ‘fine sand’ consistency spod. hopefully they solve it. 35000 liters minimum per annum for spod management, in a water scarce environment

What if Fe is over 1% on occasion (head grade is not static by any means m, it swings? Does the cut off 0% really work? Greenbushes has a cut off of 0.7% for their tailings operations. And it would be comparable to FFX...recovery rate 70% for their tailings/—all from the most experienced experts in Spodumene Concentrate production.

despite uncertainties in process flow, the key issue is Fe, FFX had to go the more complex and open intensive route of WOF. The CRIMM’s purported betrrr magnetic separators is novel by company’s own estimate. And in my view the ore is milled to 100-150 for downstream process amenability beneficiation. It’s quite clear that the low energy consumption calcinatir needs a fine ore. Could the company dial in a larger grind size for a customer? I suspect so.

one last thing for this post, why no mention of dust control in DFS? Greenbushes/ BDA, rates “dust” a mention for its proposed Tailings plant ( source: HKEX IPO PDF in TLH forum, uploaded by your truly)

Expand

Nearly every post of yours is FFX...... why?
I sometimes wonder why I take the time to trash talk companies I am invested in, but to spend the amount of time you do fighting FFX crew makes me feel sad for you.
does it make you feel good?

FFX Price at posting: 26.5¢ Sentiment: Buy Disclosure: Held
2 Upvote

0 Great analysis

Reply

Top Stories

WMG

Western Mines identifies 2 high-grade zones at Mulga Tank in WA

PTR

Petratherm adds $1.6 to the piggybank ahead of SA titanium drilling program

WR1

Winsome scoping study proposes low-cost operation for Adina lithium project

ALR

Altair Minerals hits high-grade copper and gold at Wee MacGregor, QLD

SNG

Siren Gold boosts antimony resource by 66% to 14.5Kt at Auld Creek, NZ