lovetofly i agree with fluff, and thats a rarity for me. But to...

lovetofly i agree with fluff, and thats a rarity for me. But to say that its 3M indefinitely is incorrect.

'There is no evidence in recent times of another company being involved.'
Is this all the evidence you got? Mate go back to 2007 and start doing your research before throwing accusations around. You have no right to demand an apology mate its obvious you have not done enough research. Even with all the research done by myself i can be almost 90% sure but there is still that 10% chance that this is a left field company. My current guess is GSK to which i've read the 2007 announcements and concluded.