@RhysD@Yarnos20 - this is where I think substance crosses over with process. I think we're mostly agreed that it's about the process of non-disclosure at this point, rather than the substance of why Hinrich voted the way he did.
That's the problem with a conflict of interest. You may have the best reasoning in the world, but the non-disclosure of your actual (and not potential) conflict taints your vote irreparably. Other members disclosed their conflict, and were allowed to serve. You could ask the rhetorical question - if you had such good reasoning, then why did you conceal your conflict of interest in the first place?
Where the substance of Hinrich's reasoning comes in is where the FDA's problem starts. They adopted it holus bolus and paid no regard to the other 9 votes.
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- Conflict of Interest Evidence Thread - C. Hinrichs in ODAC Meeting
@RhysD@Yarnos20 - this is where I think substance crosses over...
- There are more pages in this discussion • 73 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add MSB (ASX) to my watchlist
(20min delay)
|
|||||
Last
$1.09 |
Change
0.015(1.40%) |
Mkt cap ! $1.238B |
Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
$1.11 | $1.12 | $1.08 | $11.51M | 10.52M |
Buyers (Bids)
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
2 | 17804 | $1.09 |
Sellers (Offers)
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
$1.09 | 230637 | 5 |
View Market Depth
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
1 | 2500 | 1.085 |
8 | 103868 | 1.080 |
4 | 20400 | 1.075 |
11 | 85089 | 1.070 |
4 | 50577 | 1.065 |
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
1.090 | 5437 | 2 |
1.095 | 19582 | 2 |
1.100 | 34717 | 4 |
1.105 | 10000 | 1 |
1.110 | 53313 | 3 |
Last trade - 16.10pm 03/05/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
|
|||||
Last
$1.09 |
  |
Change
0.015 ( 1.85 %) |
|||
Open | High | Low | Volume | ||
$1.10 | $1.12 | $1.08 | 1937390 | ||
Last updated 15.59pm 03/05/2024 ? |
Featured News
MSB (ASX) Chart |