confused -is it kerogen?, page-6

Good summary dicko.

Those parameters look pretty good for shale oil/gas. Kerogen type is oil prone, thickness is good, TOC is good, Tmax and Vro are perfect.

The only issue I can see from what they've presented is the depth. There is a reason both the Eagle Ford and Bakken analogues are in the 2000 to 4000m range. Shallower than 1300m is not usually regarded as a shale play. So we'd be looking at the "1300+" zones for this.

There are other factors such as clay content that they didn't mention too. But this is an OIP calculation, and clay content doesn't affect OIP, it only affects frackability and recovery.