Conquesta - Movement, page-4

jack, i talked about a particular type of dnpm entry, in relation to important tenements and superfluous tenements and showed a recent example (this month) of a ctm subsidiary tenement

i didn't say a license had been revoked, however the screenshots provided, from the dnpm and ministry of justice, did "say" an 'exploration license' had been, effectively, "revoked"

i did refer to it as a superfluous tenement

it was a post that had as its main point, a heads up as to what dnpm entry, if applied to an important tenement (not a superfluous tenement), would be a clear sell signal, imho

it was clearly not a post that was appreciated by the ctm thread and has been removed