jack, i talked about a particular type of dnpm entry, in relation to important tenements and superfluous tenements and showed a recent example (this month) of a ctm subsidiary tenement
i didn't say a license had been revoked, however the screenshots provided, from the dnpm and ministry of justice, did "say" an 'exploration license' had been, effectively, "revoked"
i did refer to it as a superfluous tenement
it was a post that had as its main point, a heads up as to what dnpm entry, if applied to an important tenement (not a superfluous tenement), would be a clear sell signal, imho
it was clearly not a post that was appreciated by the ctm thread and has been removed
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- CTM
- Conquesta - Movement
Conquesta - Movement, page-4
-
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 4 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add CTM (ASX) to my watchlist
|
|||||
Last
35.0¢ |
Change
0.000(0.00%) |
Mkt cap ! $173.6M |
Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
34.0¢ | 35.0¢ | 33.5¢ | $4.43K | 13.09K |
Buyers (Bids)
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
1 | 1300 | 34.5¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
35.0¢ | 2666 | 1 |
View Market Depth
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
2 | 32000 | 0.335 |
2 | 40000 | 0.330 |
2 | 52941 | 0.315 |
4 | 164516 | 0.310 |
3 | 137438 | 0.305 |
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
0.360 | 10000 | 1 |
0.365 | 49417 | 1 |
0.370 | 50000 | 1 |
0.390 | 38670 | 3 |
0.400 | 26315 | 1 |
Last trade - 13.32pm 16/08/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
Featured News
CTM (ASX) Chart |