gns eps 2010=7.7 2011=10.2; nta 2.02 earnings 2010=61.1...

gns eps 2010=7.7 2011=10.2; nta 2.02 earnings 2010=61.1 2011=81.7 {millions}

fea eps 2010=6.5,2011=13.0; nta=000 earnings 2010=6.5 2011=13 {millions}

nb-=in fea,s case it shows nta ooo this was in 2008 i guess it has never changed,000nta tells me this is most likely a house of cards built on the debt incurred with other peoples money-----one of my big rules is never buy a company with 000nta.

i had to pay the hard way to learn this and its one rule i will not break,so you see fea and gns are immediately different companys and that was 2008 analysts loved fea.i dont in fact i will be surprised if they get backing without a substantial cash injection and no a raising is not going to happen.

gns have grown the scope of their business in the same period so the business models a very different