watso thought that he would adjudicate, but sadly cannot do so. it seems that the transcript could have been done using "voice recognition" software, after all, there is a line in the transcript which is obviously wrong, where the transcript shows (in the very same segment) "the loss on a vision", when the word "ignition" should have been used. frankly, it is hard to say that pelm is wrong, but it is time for the football, so who really cares
contaminants , page-21
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 44 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
