Australia's largest stock trading and investment forum Australia's #1 stock forum

Hi Eagle, I'm not sure I follow your logic on that one (wrt...

First 3 Last

Share
Profile

Follow
gdbeech

5,033 Posts.

06/12/16

21:17

Post #: 21151241
Share

Originally posted by eagle888 ↑

There will be many examples of stunning contradictions
but the one that stands out for me is Abbott’s reaction
to Gillard’s Misogyny speech but when calls were being
made from within his own party to replace his Chief of Staff(COS),
Abbott strongly came to her defence and suggested they would
not be doing that if the COS was a Peter instead of a Peta.

The inference being that the issue existed because the COS was a woman
instead of a man.

He basically pointed the misogyny type finger at his own colleagues.

Expand

Hi Eagle,

I'm not sure I follow your logic on that one (wrt 'pointing his finger at his own colleagues').

Its obvious Peta was appointed to the role because she was / is unquestionably the best person for the job. No more needs to be said.

Cheers,
Upvote

Reply

Top Stories

ASX200 dives as inflation clocks in at 4% – higher than 3.8% consensus

SS1

Sun Silver submits US$60M Silver Paste Funding Application to US DoE

End of FY is a time to juggle wins, losses and capital gains taxes

Time for retail therapy buying in the shopping Scentre for hot stocks

Eurozone-based companies find new ways to secure a regional lithium supply

There are more pages in this discussion • 2 more messages in this thread...

First 3 Last